Skip to the content

Fiery Flash: UnitedHealth's Cost Crisis Amid Lingering Controversies

A "Fiery flash" is a descriptive term that we use to describe a sudden, intense burst of flame or light – or strongly rising stock price –, while we also consider the opposite, a sudden, intense absence of light or warmth – or strongly declining stock price.

Shares of UnitedHealth Group, the United States’ largest and most diversified health insurer, plunged 22% on Wednesday after the company unexpectedly slashed its 2025 earnings forecast, citing sharply higher medical costs that unnerved investors and sent ripples across the managed care sector.

UnitedHealth provides health benefit plans for employers and individuals in the United States. Notwithstanding government programs like Medicare (age 65+) and Medicaid (limited income) the country doesn't have a comprehensive national health insurance. Access to health insurance, whether private or public, is always provided by companies like UnitedHealth. This week’s sell-off reversed significant recent gains for the company, whose stock had climbed 16% over the past month, often seen as a defensive holding (~100% domestic service revenues) amid broader, tariff induced, market volatility. The negative reaction came despite UnitedHealth reporting a better-than-expected Medical Loss Ratio – a key measure of spending on patient care – which beat estimates by a full percentage point for the recent quarter.

However, that operational positive was overshadowed by a substantial cut to its 2025 earnings guidance. The company reduced its profit outlook by approximately $4 per share from a previously anticipated $30, a significant revision that signaled deeper underlying challenges.

UnitedHealth management attributed the lowered forecast to two primary factors.

Firstly, the company pointed to significantly elevated medical cost trends, particularly within its large Medicare business. These costs were reportedly running at twice the rate the company had anticipated. While the specific drivers remained unclear, the development raised concerns about the insurer's ability to accurately price its plans. Since managed care plans for the upcoming year are typically priced by late spring based on cost data through May, the current elevated trends suggest that plans for the remainder of 2025 could be based on outdated assumptions, potentially leading to inadequate premiums relative to claims.

Secondly, UnitedHealth cited challenges integrating large groups of new members acquired in Texas and Washington. The company indicated that the health risks of these populations may have been underestimated by their previous insurers, resulting in UnitedHealth inheriting unexpectedly sicker, and therefore costlier, groups of customers than initially projected.

Notwithstanding this explanation, UnitedHealth is of course not without controversy. At the end of last year its CEO Brian Thompson was murdered outside a midtown Manhattan hotel. Luigi Mangione's subsequent trial is currently dominating headlines in the US. The company had previously come under criticism for its strict reimbursement policies and its omnipresent role in the opaque (‘broken’ according to some observers) US healthcare system.

Given how effectively they have managed costs over time, you could wonder if UnitedHealth hasn’t just loosened the reins to be seen as a more empathetic player. That would mean waving through more treatments and visits than they would have otherwise done… .

This abrupt overhaul by the industry leader comes on top of uncertainty surrounding the regulatory framework, with both President Trump and Health Secretary Robert Kennedy clearly aiming to shake up the status quo here as well. Investor confidence in the sector is likely to remain low for a long time to come.

About the author

Stijn Plessers

Stijn Plessers

Stijn Plessers holds a degree in Economics (Catholic University of Leuven). He started his career in 2006 at a private bank and then worked for KBC Asset Management for 15 years. At KBC AM, he was originally responsible for managing a large credit and OTC derivatives portfolio before focusing entirely on equities. First as an analyst for the technology sector and then as a manager of specialized, global equity mandates. In April 2023, Stijn made the switch to Econopolis Wealth Management.

comments powered by Disqus